- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps

Trump's Tariffs Can Remain in Place For Now, But Appeals Court Fast Tracks a Summer Resolution
President Donald Trump's use of tariffs has been a cornerstone of his trade policy, and a recent court decision has added another layer to the ongoing saga. A federal appeals court has ruled that his heftiest tariffs can remain in effect for the time being, while legal challenges continue to unfold. However, in a move that could provide clarity sooner rather than later, the court has placed the tariff cases on a fast track for resolution this summer.
The decision comes after the Trump administration appealed a previous ruling by the Court of International Trade, which found that the president had exceeded his authority by imposing country-wide tariffs under the guise of a national emergency.
According to the appeals court ruling:
- "Both sides have made substantial arguments on the merits."
- The court concluded that a stay was warranted, considering the traditional factors.
- The case will be heard on an expedited basis by the full panel of judges at the court (en banc consideration).
- "These cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration of the merits in the first instance."
Ilya Somin, a law professor at Scalia Law School, George Mason University and plaintiff lawyer, expressed disappointment with the decision, stating it was “unfortunate.” However, he also noted the expedited review process and expressed hope for a swift resolution.
The White House, on the other hand, welcomed the stay. White House spokesman Kush Desai stated:
"The Trump administration is legally using the powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address our country’s national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking. The US Circuit Court of Appeals’ stay order is a welcome development, and we look forward to ultimately prevailing in court."
It is important to note that this appeals court ruling does not affect the sector-wide tariffs previously enacted by Trump, such as those on aluminum, steel, cars, and car parts. These tariffs were imposed under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, a different law that grants the president broad authority to levy tariffs on specific sectors if a national security risk is perceived.
The administration has relied on various legal avenues to justify its tariff policies. These include:
- Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act
- Other laws allowing for higher tariffs, albeit in a more limited capacity.
- The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which Trump attempted to use for "reciprocal" tariffs and import taxes on Mexico, Canada, and China.
JPMorgan economists estimate that without the IEEPA-related levies, the nation's effective tariff rate on goods would decrease from 13-14% to around 5%. Even at 5%, this would still be approximately double the tariff levels seen in 2024.
The ongoing uncertainty surrounding tariffs has left businesses grappling with unpredictability. Trump's administration has been known to impose, pause, raise, and lower tariffs at a rapid pace, making it challenging for businesses and consumers to accurately predict the costs of imported goods.
Trump has consistently urged businesses to relocate production to the United States to avoid tariffs. However, this process can be lengthy and costly, often requiring significant investments of time and resources.
In conclusion, while Trump's tariffs remain in place for now, the appeals court's decision to expedite the review process offers a glimmer of hope for a resolution this summer. This could provide much-needed clarity for businesses and consumers navigating the complex landscape of international trade. The legal challenges highlight the ongoing debate surrounding presidential authority in trade matters, and the outcome will undoubtedly have significant implications for the future of US trade policy.
Source: https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/10/business/tariffs-appeals-court-stay-trump
Court ruling
federal appeals court
Import tax
legal challenge
national emergency
trade authority
Trade War
Trump tariffs
US economy
US Trade
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment